New York Law Review

Bikman v. 595 Broadway Associates, 14 N.Y.3d 375 (2010): Estate’s Right to Loft Improvements Reimbursement

Published by

The New York Law Review

in

14 N.Y.3d 375 (2010)

The estate of a deceased loft tenant is entitled to recoup the value of improvements made by the tenant pursuant to Multiple Dwelling Law § 286(6).

Summary

This case addresses whether the estate of a deceased loft tenant can recover the value of improvements the tenant made to the loft under Multiple Dwelling Law § 286(6). The tenant, Minda Bikman, improved her raw loft space. After her death, the landlord sought possession. Bikman’s estate argued it was entitled to reimbursement for the improvements. The Court of Appeals held that the estate was indeed entitled to recoup the value of the improvements, emphasizing that the statute aimed to prevent unjust enrichment of the landlord at the tenant’s expense, and denying reimbursement would be unfair.

Facts

Minda Bikman became a resident of a Manhattan loft in 1974 and was a protected tenant under Article 7-C of the Multiple Dwelling Law. During her tenancy, she made improvements, including installing a kitchen and bathroom, valued at over $40,000. In 1981, 595 Broadway Associates purchased the building. After Minda’s death in 1997, Broadway sought a judgment of possession, which it obtained in 2001. Broadway then applied to the Loft Board for an abandonment order.

Procedural History

Broadway applied to the Loft Board for an abandonment order after obtaining a judgment of possession. An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) recommended granting Broadway’s application and denying the estate’s claim for reimbursement, which the Loft Board affirmed. Supreme Court annulled the Loft Board’s determination, citing Matter of Moskowitz v Jorden. The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s order, concluding it was error to grant the abandonment application without requiring a sale of the improvements and compensation to the estate. The case then went to the Court of Appeals.

Issue(s)

Whether Multiple Dwelling Law § 286(6) permits the estate of a deceased tenant to recoup the value of fixtures and improvements made to a loft property.

Holding

Yes, because Multiple Dwelling Law § 286(6) was enacted to prevent owners from receiving unearned enrichment, and it would be unfair to deprive the estate of the value of property that would have benefited the tenant had she lived.

Court’s Reasoning

The Court of Appeals agreed with the lower courts that the Loft Board’s interpretation of Multiple Dwelling Law § 286(6) was not entitled to deference because the issue was solely a matter of statutory interpretation. The court emphasized that in construing the statute, it looked to the legislative intent. The court stated that section 286(6) was enacted to prevent an owner from receiving unearned enrichment, thereby depriving compensation to the tenants who paid for the improvements. The court cited 577 Broadway Real Estate Partners v Giacinto, stating that it would be unfair to deprive the estate of the value of property which would have enured to the benefit of the tenant, had the tenant lived. The court held that the estate of a deceased tenant is permitted to recoup the value of fixtures and improvements made to the property.

More ARTICLES