Matter of Valley Gas Co. v. State Tax Commission, 44 N.Y.2d 983 (1978)
r
r
A purchase is considered for resale, and therefore potentially exempt from sales tax, when the item is acquired for the purpose of sale or rental, but the mere recovery of an item’s cost in the price of a product does not automatically constitute a rental agreement.
r
r
Summary
r
Valley Gas Company sought a sales tax exemption on cylinders used to deliver gas to customers, arguing they were purchased for resale. The New York Court of Appeals reversed the Appellate Division, holding that the cylinders were not purchased for resale and thus not tax-exempt. The court reasoned that while Valley Gas recovered the cylinder’s cost in its gas prices, this did not constitute a rental agreement. The demurrage charges for retaining cylinders beyond 30 days were rental fees, but the primary purpose of buying the cylinders was for selling gas, not for renting the cylinders themselves.
r
r
Facts
r
Valley Gas Company used metallic cylinders to deliver gas to its customers. Valley Gas did not have a specified rental charge for the use of the cylinders for the first 30 days, but it did impose demurrage charges for cylinders kept longer than that. Valley Gas sought a sales tax exemption on the purchase of these cylinders, claiming they were purchased for resale or rental, and therefore tax-exempt.
r
r
Procedural History
r
The State Tax Commission determined that Valley Gas’s initial acquisition of the cylinders was not tax-exempt. The Appellate Division reversed this determination. The State Tax Commission appealed to the New York Court of Appeals.
r
r
Issue(s)
r
Whether the cylinders purchased by Valley Gas Company to deliver gas to its customers were purchased for resale or rental, thus qualifying for a sales tax exemption under Tax Law § 1105(a) and § 1101(b)(4).
r
r
Holding
r
No, because the primary purpose of purchasing the cylinders was to facilitate the sale of gas, not to rent the cylinders, even though Valley Gas recovered the cost of the cylinders through the price of the gas and charged demurrage fees for extended use.
r
r
Court’s Reasoning
r
The court reasoned that the Tax Law defines a sale but does not separately define a resale, implying the Legislature doesn’t see them as discrete concepts. Thus, purchasing an item for sale or rental constitutes purchasing it for resale under the statute. While Valley Gas recovered the cost of the cylinders in its gas prices, this did not inherently mean the customer was renting the cylinder. The court declined to engage in