American Bible Society v. Lewisohn, 40 N.Y.2d 78 (1976)
A corporation organized exclusively for publishing and distributing the Holy Bible, without direct association with an organized religion, is entitled only to a qualified, and not an unqualified, exemption from real property taxation, which can be withdrawn by the municipality.
Summary
The American Bible Society, chartered to publish and distribute the Holy Bible without doctrinal note or comment, challenged New York City’s decision to tax its real property. The city withdrew the Society’s qualified tax exemption under Real Property Tax Law § 421(1)(b). The Court of Appeals held that the Society was not entitled to an unqualified exemption under § 421(1)(a) because it was primarily organized for Bible purposes, not religious or educational purposes. The Court reasoned that while the Society’s activities may advance Christianity, its charter prevents alignment with specific doctrinal interpretations. Thus, its purpose was deemed a “Bible purpose,” subject to the qualified exemption that the city had withdrawn. The court upheld the constitutionality of the statute, finding a rational basis for distinguishing between religious and Bible purposes in light of the state’s interest in protecting its tax base.
Facts
The American Bible Society was founded in 1816 and chartered in 1841 to publish and promote the circulation of the Holy Scriptures without note or comment. The Society’s “Bible House” is located in New York City, with eight and one-half floors used by the Society and three and one-half floors leased to other tax-exempt organizations. The Society engages in the translation, publication, and worldwide distribution of the Bible.
Procedural History
The Society was initially granted tax-exempt status in 1894. In 1971, New York City adopted Local Law No. 46, pursuant to Real Property Tax Law § 421(1)(b), transferring the Society’s real property to taxable status. The Society paid the assessed taxes under protest and filed unsuccessful applications for exemption. The Society initiated an Article 78 proceeding. Special Term directed the removal of the Society’s property from the tax rolls. The Appellate Division reversed, holding that the Society was organized primarily for Bible purposes, not religious or educational purposes. The Court of Appeals affirmed the Appellate Division’s decision.
Issue(s)
Whether the real property of the American Bible Society is entitled to an unqualified exemption from real property tax under paragraph (a) of subdivision 1 of section 421 of the Real Property Tax Law, given that the City of New York has withdrawn any qualified exemption which may have existed under paragraph (b) of that subdivision.
Holding
No, because the American Bible Society is organized and conducted primarily for Bible purposes, not religious or educational purposes, and thus is only entitled to a qualified exemption that the city has withdrawn.
Court’s Reasoning
The Court determined that the American Bible Society is primarily organized for Bible purposes, not religious purposes, within the meaning of § 421. While the Society’s activities may advance Christianity, its charter explicitly prohibits doctrinal notes or comments, precluding alignment with specific religious interpretations. The court distinguished this case from Matter of Watchtower Bible & Tract Soc. of N. Y. v Lewisohn, where the corporation was the governing body of Jehovah’s Witnesses. Here, the American Bible Society has no corporate affiliation with any religious denomination or sect. The Court also rejected the argument that the Society qualifies for an educational exemption. The court stated, “the expressed purpose to publish and circulate ‘without note or comment’ precludes alignment with any doctrinal or denominational interpretations or positions.”
The Court emphasized the Legislature’s intent to reduce tax exemptions, noting that the 1971 amendments to § 421 were enacted to address the erosion of the local tax base. The Legislature intended to distinguish between “religious” and “bible” purposes, subjecting the latter to taxation unless the Bible purpose was clearly incidental to a dominant religious purpose. The court reasoned that it “was intended to distinguish between ‘religious’ and ‘bible’ purposes, and to expose the latter to taxation unless in the particular instance the Bible purpose was clearly incidental only to a dominant religious purpose.” The Court also rejected the Society’s constitutional challenges, finding a rational basis for the legislative classification in the state’s interest in protecting its tax base. The court found no violation of due process or equal protection. As stated by the court, “The Legislature’s articulated desire to stem and to reverse the severe erosion of the local municipal tax base…surely provides a rational basis for the expanded grant of authority to tax.”