Kurz v. Bd. of Appeals, Town of Geddes, 30 N.Y.2d 201 (1972)
r
r
Zoning ordinances that restrict private profit-making enterprises in residential districts are constitutional and a permissible exercise of the police power.
r
r
Summary
r
This case concerns a challenge to a zoning ordinance in the Town of Geddes, New York, which restricted the development of private profit-making enterprises in residential districts. The New York Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s decision, holding that the zoning regulation was constitutional and a valid exercise of the town’s police power. The court emphasized that residential districts are primarily intended for family life, not commercial pursuits, and that excluding business enterprises from these zones is a common and accepted practice in zoning ordinances. The court cited precedent supporting the exclusion of boarding houses and other commercial activities from residential areas to preserve the character of these districts.
r
r
Facts
r
The Town of Geddes had a zoning ordinance that restricted the development of private profit-making enterprises in residential districts. The specific facts regarding Kurz’s proposed use of their property are not detailed in this memorandum opinion, but the central issue revolves around whether the zoning ordinance could validly prevent a commercial enterprise within a residential zone.
r
r
Procedural History
r
The case originated from a decision regarding the application of the Town of Geddes’ zoning ordinance. The Appellate Division upheld the ordinance’s restrictions. The New York Court of Appeals then reviewed and affirmed the Appellate Division’s order.
r
r
Issue(s)
r
Whether a zoning ordinance that restricts the development of private profit-making enterprises in a residential district is constitutional and a permissible exercise of the police power conferred upon the town by the legislature.
r
r
Holding
r
Yes, because the zoning regulation is constitutional and a permissible exercise of the police power conferred on the town by the Legislature, as residential districts are primarily intended for family life rather than commercial pursuits.
r
r
Court’s Reasoning
r
The Court of Appeals based its reasoning on the established principle that zoning ordinances can validly exclude commercial enterprises from residential districts to protect the character of those districts. The court referenced Town Law § 261, which grants municipalities the power to enact zoning regulations. It cited Matter of Wulfsohn v Burden, emphasizing that the primary purpose of residential districts is