New York Law Review

Brady v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 97 N.Y.2d 657 (2001): Upholding DMV’s Authority to Suspend Licenses for Deception in Testing

Published by

The New York Law Review

in

Brady v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 97 N.Y.2d 657 (2001)

A court conviction is not necessary for the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to suspend or revoke a driver’s license based on a violation of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, including engaging in deception during a license examination.

Summary

The New York Court of Appeals upheld the DMV’s suspension of a driver’s license after an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) determined that the driver, Brady, had engaged in deception during a Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) test by leaving the testing area with the test materials. The Court found that this action violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 392, which prohibits deception in connection with any examination, and justified the license suspension. The Court emphasized that a criminal conviction is not required for the DMV to take administrative action against a driver’s license.

Facts

Brady took the written portion of a Commercial Driver’s License test.
During the test, Brady left the testing area with the test materials.
The DMV’s test procedures and explicit directions prohibited removing test materials from the testing area, creating a risk of illegal use.
The DMV charged Brady with violating Vehicle and Traffic Law § 392 for deceiving in connection with an examination.

Procedural History

An ALJ found that Brady committed deception by leaving the testing area with the test materials, violating Vehicle and Traffic Law § 392, and suspended his license for 60 days.
The DMV Board of Appeals confirmed the ALJ’s determination.
Brady commenced an Article 78 proceeding in Supreme Court, which granted the petition and annulled the DMV’s determination.
The Appellate Division reversed the Supreme Court, confirmed the DMV’s determination, and dismissed the proceeding.
Brady appealed to the New York Court of Appeals.

Issue(s)

Whether the DMV can suspend a driver’s license for violating Vehicle and Traffic Law § 392 (deception in connection with an examination) without a criminal conviction.
Whether the ALJ’s determination was supported by substantial evidence.

Holding

1. Yes, because Vehicle and Traffic Law § 510(7) allows the DMV to suspend or revoke licenses for violations of the Vehicle and Traffic Law without a court conviction.
2. The Court was unable to rule on whether substantial evidence supported the determination

More ARTICLES